<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ethanol Responds to Scam Article</title>
	<link>http://corncommentary.com/2008/03/31/ethanol-responds-to-scam-article/</link>
	<description>The blog about corn farming and American agriculture</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Moffitt</title>
		<link>http://corncommentary.com/2008/03/31/ethanol-responds-to-scam-article/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Moffitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://corncommentary.com/2008/03/31/ethanol-responds-to-scam-article/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Time Loves Our Addiction To Oil?

Michael Grunwell’s sweeping indictment of the biofuels movement in “The Clean Energy Scam” was the most stunning piece of misinformation I have seen published in a major news outlet. The article laid the blame for everything from destabilization in Pakistan to deforestation in Brazil at the feet of biofuel.  Astonishingly, Grunwell did not quote a single supporter of the cleaner-burning fuel in the cover article!

The simple facts are these:
• There is a clear scientific consensus that vehicles using E85 or biodiesel emit significantly less air pollution than those using traditional fuels. 
• A typical E85 user prevents 4 tons of lifecycle carbon dioxide (CO2) and other harmful pollutants from entering our air every year. 
• The National Renewable Energy Laboratory reports that biodiesel (B100) use reduces lifecycle carbon dioxide emissions by 78%.

Space does not allow for me to point out the many errors in fact, rampant speculation, and use of discredited data and opinion contained in Grunswell’s article – I’m sure others will step up to that task. Let me just say that the American Lung Association of the Upper Midwest remains a strong supporter of cleaner-burning biofuels such as E85 and biodiesel, and we reject its unfair labeling as a “scam.”

Harold Wimmer, CEO
American Lung Association of the Upper Midwest
SPRINGFIELD, IL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time Loves Our Addiction To Oil?</p>
<p>Michael Grunwell’s sweeping indictment of the biofuels movement in “The Clean Energy Scam” was the most stunning piece of misinformation I have seen published in a major news outlet. The article laid the blame for everything from destabilization in Pakistan to deforestation in Brazil at the feet of biofuel.  Astonishingly, Grunwell did not quote a single supporter of the cleaner-burning fuel in the cover article!</p>
<p>The simple facts are these:<br />
• There is a clear scientific consensus that vehicles using E85 or biodiesel emit significantly less air pollution than those using traditional fuels.<br />
• A typical E85 user prevents 4 tons of lifecycle carbon dioxide (CO2) and other harmful pollutants from entering our air every year.<br />
• The National Renewable Energy Laboratory reports that biodiesel (B100) use reduces lifecycle carbon dioxide emissions by 78%.</p>
<p>Space does not allow for me to point out the many errors in fact, rampant speculation, and use of discredited data and opinion contained in Grunswell’s article – I’m sure others will step up to that task. Let me just say that the American Lung Association of the Upper Midwest remains a strong supporter of cleaner-burning biofuels such as E85 and biodiesel, and we reject its unfair labeling as a “scam.”</p>
<p>Harold Wimmer, CEO<br />
American Lung Association of the Upper Midwest<br />
SPRINGFIELD, IL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
